<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>「ICO 」搜尋結果 - 七德律師事務所</title>
	<atom:link href="https://svlaws.com/search/ICO/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://svlaws.com/</link>
	<description>位於台北車站地區的法律事務所，由持有律師及會計師執照的多位合夥人創立，除一般民刑事訴訟外，另專於股權契約、合約撰擬及審查、商業法規、公司設立等商務案件</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 04:36:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>zh-TW</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">186423419</site>	<item>
		<title>區塊鏈三部曲：監管再臨</title>
		<link>https://svlaws.com/science-and-tech-law/blockchain-ep-3/</link>
					<comments>https://svlaws.com/science-and-tech-law/blockchain-ep-3/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[曾韋綸]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[科技與新創法律]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[區塊鏈]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[金融科技 FinTech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svlf.local/?p=998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>藉由梳理虛擬貨幣首次公開募資在投信投顧法、證交法及銀行法上的爭議，可發現目前金管會規範目標皆集中在資產型ICO，亦即具有證券性或投資性時，才會有規制必要</p>
<p>文章 <a href="https://svlaws.com/science-and-tech-law/blockchain-ep-3/">區塊鏈三部曲：監管再臨</a> 出處 <a href="https://svlaws.com">七德律師事務所</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://svlaws.com/science-and-tech-law/blockchain-ep-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">998</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>區塊鏈二部曲：ICO 奇謀</title>
		<link>https://svlaws.com/science-and-tech-law/blockchain-ep-2/</link>
					<comments>https://svlaws.com/science-and-tech-law/blockchain-ep-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[曾韋綸]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[科技與新創法律]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[區塊鏈]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[金融科技 FinTech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://svlf.local/?p=974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>綜觀各國不同的監理態度，可知ICO問題，莫過於和IPO區分、是否適用IPO規則、洗錢防制和防止詐騙等，若可先以「金融監理沙盒」管控風險，亦可給予新興金融科技發揮實驗的空間</p>
<p>文章 <a href="https://svlaws.com/science-and-tech-law/blockchain-ep-2/">區塊鏈二部曲：ICO 奇謀</a> 出處 <a href="https://svlaws.com">七德律師事務所</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://svlaws.com/science-and-tech-law/blockchain-ep-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">974</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: svlaws.com @ 2026-10-24 14:18:08 by W3 Total Cache
-->